June 29th - July 2nd 2009
Vienna University of Technology (TU Wien), Wiedner Hauptstrasse 8-10, 1040 Vienna, Austria
Building “Freihaus”, green zone (also known as tower “A”), 5th floor, Institute of discrete mathematics and geometry (E104), seminar room
Customised Google Map with locations relevant to the participants.
Map of the floors in the building.
This workshop brings together eminent researchers in the area of
logic and computation and
continues a successful series of joint
workshops organised by Steklov Institute Moscow and Vienna University of
Technology.
The workshop will cover a variety of topics in theoretical and applied
logic centered around the notions of proof and computation:
Topics include but are not restricted to proof theory, constructive
logics, realizability, modal logic, Lambek calculus and linear logic,
provability logics and algebras, formal arithmetic and fragments,
methods of automated and interactive proof search, categorial grammars
and other applications in linguistics, fuzzy logic and epistemic
reasoning, proof complexity, computational complexity.
Participation at the workshop is free.
Program Commitee:
Matthias Baaz,
(Vienna University of Technology, Kurt Gödel Society)
Lev Beklemishev,
(Steklov Mathematical Institute of Moscow)
Organizational Commitee:
Matthias Baaz, Vienna University of Technology
Oliver Fasching, Vienna University of Technology
Supported by FWF and РФФИ (RFBR).
Mo, 2009, June 29th, Seminar room (open event)
| 9:55 - 10:00 | Opening Address |
| 10:00 - 11:00 | Sergei Adian (main lecture) |
| 11:00 - 11:40 | Mati Pentus |
| 11:40 - 12:10 | coffee break |
| 12:10 - 12:50 | Ekaterina Fokina |
| 12:50 - 13:30 | Michel Parigot |
| 13:30 - 14:50 | lunch break |
| 14:50 - 15:30 | Lev Beklemishev |
| 15:30 - 16:10 | Valentin Shehtman |
| 16:10 - 16:40 | coffee break |
| 16:40 - 17:20 | Gernot Salzer |
| 17:20 - 18:00 | Magdalena Ortiz |
| 20:00 | Conference dinner |
Tu, 2009, June 30th, Seminar room (open event)
| 9:00 - 10:00 | Alexander Leitsch (main lecture) |
| 10:00 - 10:40 | Daniel Weller |
| 10:40 - 11:20 | coffee break |
| 11:20 - 12:00 | Ilya Shapirovsky |
| 12:00 - 12:40 | Stefan Hetzl |
| 12:40 - 12:50 | break |
| 12:50 - 13:30 | Sándor Jenei |
| 13:30 - 15:00 | lunch break |
| 15:00 - 15:40 | George Metcalfe |
| 15:40 - 16:20 | Christian Fermüller |
| 16:20 - 16:50 | coffee break |
| 16:50 - 17:30 | Matthias Baaz |
| 17:30 - 18:10 | Thomas Vetterlein |
We, 2009, July 1st, Seminar room
| 10:00 - 11:00 | Round table discussion: Algebraic solutions for proof theoretical problems.
Chairs: Adian, Beklemishev |
| 11:00 - 11:30 | break |
| 11:30 - 12:30 | Round table discussion: The mathematical status of fuzzy logic.
Chairs: Baaz, Ciabattoni |
| 12:30 - 14:50 | lunch break |
| 14:50 - 16:00 | Preparation of a Joint Research Project for Austrian Science Fund (FWF) and Russian Foundation for Basic Research (RFBR) |
| 16:00 - 16:30 | break |
| 16:30 - 17:30 | Exchange of young scientists of Steklov Institute and Vienna University of Technology |
Th, 2009, July 2nd, Seminar room
| 10:00 - 13:00 | Preparation of a Joint Project for
FP7-PEOPLE-2010-IRSES (Marie Curie IRSES International Research Staff Exchange Scheme)
Chairs: Baaz, Beklemishev, Parigot |
| 13:00 - 14:50 | lunch break |
| 14:50 - 16:00 |
Organisational meeting for the enhancement
of the participation of Austrian and Russian logicians
in the Kurt Gödel Research Prize Fellowships Program
Chairs: Baaz, Beklemishev |
| 16:00 - 16:10 | Closing address |
We regret having to inform you, that Prof. Plisko had to cancel his
participation in the event due to a sudden death of a close family
member.
Our deepest condolences to Prof. Plisko and his family.
Sergei Adian, Steklov Mathematical Institute of Moscow
Estimation of derivation lengths in one particular string rewriting system
Abstract: We shall study a string rewriting (semi-Thue) system in the alphabet
{a,b,c} given by three rules: {aa→bc, bb→ac, cc→ab}. Termination of
this system was proved by D. Hofmann and J. Waldmann in 2006. From their
proof only an exponential upper bound on derivation lengths can be
inferred. We give a sharp quadratic upper and lower bounds on derivation
lengths for this system.
Matthias Baaz, Vienna University of Technology
Gödel Logics: The monadic class
Abstract: We describe the status of the decision problem for the monadic class of Gödel
logics (both for decidability and satisfiability, which poses different
problems)
Especially we show the decidability of satisfiability for a subclass of the
one-variable-class, which does not have the finite model property.
Lev Beklemishev, Steklov Mathematical Institute of Moscow
On topological interpretation of polymodal provability logic
Abstract: The well-known system of provability GLP (introduced by Japaridze) is
known to be Kripke-incomplete. We study natural topological models of
GLP where modalities correspond to derived set operators on a
poly-topological space. We show topological completeness for the
fragment of GLP with two modalities. On the other hand, for more than
two modalities, completeness w.r.t. ordinal spaces turns out to be
dependent on large cardinal axioms of ZFC and various facts on
stationary sets and reflection. In particular, it is consistent
(relative to ZFC) that GLP is incomplete. However, under the assumption
of large cardinal axioms one can establish at least some partial
completeness results. Partly joint work with Thomas Icard and Guram
Bezhanishvili.
Christian Fermüller, Vienna University of Technology
Linguistics, Logic, and Vagueness
Ekaterina Fokina, University of Vienna
Algorithmic properties of structures and their theories
Abstract:
In this lecture we survey the main directions of research in computable
model theory. In particular we discuss the questions of existence and
uniqueness of computable structures, as well as the questions of
algorithmic complexity of theories with computable models and of classes
of computable structures. We present some recent results and open
questions in each of these directions.
Stefan Hetzl, Ecole Polytechnique, Paris
On the form of witness terms
Abstract: This talk will be about recent work on analyzing the development of terms
during Gentzen-style cut-elimination in first-order logic and Peano arithmetic.
The main result is a characterization of the form of witness terms in cut-free
proofs in terms of structured combinations of basic substiutions that are read
off from the proof with cuts. Based on this result, it is shown that each proof
(with cuts) induces a regular tree grammar s.t. each term computable by
cut-elimination can also be computed by the grammar. As another application,
a class of proofs in first-order logic is shown to have only elementary
cut-elimination. From the algorithmic point of view, what is obtained is a
method for computing witness terms that circumvents cut-elimination and has
several advantages, it allows for example to find the shortest witness term.
In the second part of the talk, these results are extended to proofs of
Σ01-formulas in Peano arithmetic.
Sándor Jenei, Vienna University of Technology
On the geometry of residuated lattices with applications
Abstract:
A few geometric aspects of the study of residuated lattices will be
summarized together with a new finding in this direction. By using it,
we present one application: the structural description of e-involutive
uninorms on [0,1]. This description involves a striking
new construction, called skew-symmetrization, in which one has to leave the accustomed residuated setting, and enter the
co-residuated setting. The main metamathematical contribution of this
particular application is to point out: for the description of
residuated structures one needs as well co-residuation.
Alexander Leitsch, Vienna University of Technology
Fast Cut-Elimination by CERES
CERES is a method of cut-elimination based on the construction of
a resolution refutation r of a characteristic clause set
CL(P) extracted from an LK-proof P. The
complexity of cut-elimination by CERES is directly related to the size of
the refutation r of CL(P). Methods of resolution
decision procedures for clause classes provide powerful tools to
identify classes of proofs admitting elementary cut-elimination,
where reductive methods fail. We investigate several classes of
proofs for which cut-elimination can be reduced to resolution
refutations on well known decidable classes like Herbrand's class
and the one-variable class. Finally we show that the complexity of CERES is
uniformely superior to that of Gentzen-type reduction methods.
George Metcalfe, Vanderbilt University, USA
Interpolation and Amalgamation for Ordered Algebraic Structures
Abstract: In this talk I will explain how the logical property of
interpolation can be used as a stepping stone to the algebraic property
of amalgamation. In particular, I will give a simple proof of the so-called
deductive interpolation property for lattice ordered abelian groups that
implies not only the amalgamation property but also decidability and
generation of the variety by the integers. I will also show how the
approach can be modified to establish the amalgamation property for
the variety of MV-algebras, the algebraic semantics for Łukasiewicz logic.
Magdalena Ortiz, Vienna University of Technology
Querying Description Logic Knowledge Bases: automata-theoretic techniques
Abstract: Description Logics (DLs) are a family of languages for logic
representation. They have gained importance in the last years due to
their role in the semantic Web and, more recently, to their popularity
as mechanisms for structuring, accessing and sharing data repositories.
As a consequence, using query languages known from databases to access
DL knowledge bases has become a major topic of interest in the knowledge
representation community. The area poses some very interesting
challenges. Unlike the traditional database setting, infinite structures
and incomplete data under the open world assumption must be handled.
While DLs are closely related to modal and program logics, the
considered query languages usually fall in orthogonal fragments of
predicate logic. Novel ideas must be exploited in order to adapt and
combine reasoning techniques from different fields.
In this talk, we will discuss the query answering problem for expressive
description logics. In particular, we discuss how techniques based on
alternating two-way automata on infinite trees (2ATA) can be exploited
for knowledge base reasoning and query answering in very expressive
description logics, obtaining new tight complexity bounds and
significantly pushing the decidability frontier with respect to both the
query language and the considered DL.
Michel Parigot, University Paris 7
Deep inference and proof complexity
Mati Pentus, Moscow State University
Proof nets and NP-completeness of the Lambek calculus
Abstract: Given a sequent of the Lambek calculus, the variable part in
proof search consists of axiom links. We consider two
notions of proof nets, which provide efficient algorithms
for checking whether given axiom links yield a proof net. We
discuss some complexity results on Lambek calculus that have
been proved using these proof nets (Mati Pentus, 2003;
Yury Savateev, 2008).
Gernot Salzer, Vienna University of Technology
Description Problems over Finite Totally-Ordered Domains
Abstract: Constraints are a formalism to specify admissible assignments to
variables. The constraint satisfaction problem is the question
whether for a given constraint any admissible assignment exists.
The description problem is in some sense the reverse question:
given a set of assignments, find a constraint satisfied by
(exactly) these assignments. We present several classes of
many-valued formulas and affine constraints for which the description
problem can be solved efficiently.
Ilya Shapirovsky, Institiute of Information Transmission Problems, RAS
Abstract: In this talk we consider fusions of ordered sums of transitive Kripke frames.
We show that if satisfiability problems for classes of
monomodal Kripke frames C1 and C2 are in PSPACE, then the
satisfiability problem for the fusion I(C1)∗I(C2)
is also in PSPACE, where I(C) denotes the class of ordered sums of
frames from C over the class of all finite
index sets. It leads immediately to PSPACE-decidability for a wide class
of fusions of transitive modal logics.
Valentin Shehtman, Steklov Mathematical Institute of Moscow
Simplicial and metaframe semantics for modal predicate logics
Abstract: Simplicial and metaframe semantics were introduced by D. Skvortsov in
1990 as natural generalizations of Ghilardi's functor semantics. Unlike
Kripke semantics, they are rather powerful, but not so handy. The talk
gives an overview of main properties
of these semantics, together with a new result sharpening Skvortsov's
representation theorem.
Thomas Vetterlein, Medical University of Vienna
On logics handling both uncertainty and gradation
Daniel Weller, Vienna University of Technology
Proof Skolemization and De-Skolemization
| © 2009. Impressum gem. § 25 MedienG: Kurt Gödel Gesellschaft, Wien |
Latest change: 2009-06-24
|